3. Part 4

1. Would you like to see a similar questionnaire for all of RFCs 2445 and 2446 (knowing that it would be quite large).

   Vendor would like to see similar questionnaire for all of RFCs 2445 and especially 2446.

   Vendor would like to see a similar questionnaire for RFC2445 and 2446.

2. Was it worthwhile for you to fill this out in the sense that it allows you to compare your implementation to the proposed standards?

   Yes

   It was useful to fill out the questionnaire.

3. Can you offer us any additional comments to help us do better in the future?

   To be accurate, the question “Does your product conform the specification” should be split into (a) Does your product access iCalendar objects conforming to the specification and (b) Does your product generate iCalendar objects conforming to the specification. I’ve answered the second question because most of the time, we were reading iCalendar objects generated by us.

   [ We will answer this part in the second questionnaire by asking those exact questions ]

   Another vendor commented about the use of yes/no instead of producing/consuming.

   Vendor thought It would be very helpful when all the replies would be open for reading by everyone, so that we can compare our implementations.

   Vendor felt that to assist completion of future questionnaires, examples for complex areas would be useful.